There are some things that Safari does objectively better than Chrome.
Safari wins most of the benchmarks – often by a substantial margin – but you’ll find it doesn’t make much of a difference in terms of everyday use. On newer hardware, the sorts of optimizations that these companies make to speed up their browsers, they’re just not that noticeable.
#Chrome vs safari for mac mac#
Best Mac Browser – Safari vs Chrome: Performance There are pluses and minuses to each browser – is one truly better than the other? Let’s take a look. These days, there are really only three web browser of note on OS X: Safari, which is produced by Apple and pre-installed by default on every Mac, Google’s Chrome, which in recent years has become the web’s darling on PC, Mac, and mobile devices, and Mozilla’s Firefox, which started the original battle to kill off Internet Explorer but has since fallen in the rankings.įor the most part, the battle comes down to Safari vs Chrome – Safari is pre-installed, and Google leverages their historically large web presence to sell users on Chrome. But in Safari vs Chrome, who wins the title of best Mac browser? We dig in and find out. You can even brag about its impressive benchmark scores every once in a while.When it comes to setting up your Mac these days, there are only two browsers most people consider: Apple’s Safari and Google’s Chrome.
There’s also more than just speed to take into consideration - one of my coworkers recently complained about Chrome being “a complete disaster” when it came to battery life on their M1 MacBook Air.īut on the flip side, if you’re perfectly happy with the features Chrome has, and it doesn’t seem to make your computer sluggish, I’d recommend just sticking with it. I use both Chrome and Safari, and I don’t feel any marked speed differences between the two. In my opinion, it’s probably not worth basing your browser choice on benchmarks. While Chrome isn’t entirely to blame for heavy RAM usage (all those scripts it’s so fast at running take up space and resources of their own, and it can actually be tricky to measure system resource usage), it does have a reputation for being taking up a lot of space in memory. But for what it’s worth, most of the complaints I’ve heard from colleagues and strangers on the internet is that Chrome is a resource hog, not that it’s slow.
Performance is a big deal when it comes to general web browsing - you don’t want to wait around when using a web app. With my computer’s weaker processor and less RAM, I didn’t hit the 300 mark the Google team says it achieved. That’s around a 30 percent difference on average, though obviously, there was a high amount of variability with Safari.
#Chrome vs safari for mac pro#
Repeating it on my 13-inch M1-powered MacBook Pro with 16 GB of RAM, I got an even bigger performance delta: Chrome scored 252 runs per minute, plus or minus 8.6, and Safari got 185, plus or minus 46. Google notes that it ran its tests on a 14-inch MacBook Pro with a 10-core M1 Max chip and 64 GB of RAM. On lower-end hardware, the performance gap between Chrome and Safari can be even greater
0 kommentar(er)
